Properties TAGs on Companies
under review
T
Tiago Silva
Would it be possible to implement a ADVANCED/properties page for Companies within the platform?
Currently, we already have an ADVANCED/properties page for Experiences and Teams.
This new ADVANCED/properties page for Companies would initially be used by the Compliance and PPD team to flag companies that are fraudulent, under investigation, or illicit — particularly those that should not have public pages on the platform.
Additionally, this page would work in conjunction with the company’s status in the platform. When any irregularities are identified, the company could be marked as “suspended.”
At the moment, I’m developing a classification report that uses company data to determine whether a company is “Illicit” or “Not Illicit” using an SLM classification model.
The model will generate a report highlighting potentially illicit companies for the Compliance team to manually review (Human-in-Loop).
After this manual review, the Compliance team would use the new ADVANCED/properties page to add a tag, for example:
Key = 'illicit_company', Value = 'yes'
Key = 'illicit_company', Value = 'no'
This tagging process would feedback into our dataset, supporting continuous retraining and improvement of the AI model.
Any questions please let me know.
Thanks
Emily Masching
marked this post as
under review
Emily Masching
Jordan Ell any concerns before I schedule? Tiago and I discussed December or January timing. My only flag is that unlike our properties fields on experiences and teams, we'd have to make this Riipen Admin-accessible only.
Jordan Ell
Emily Masching yes. I really hesitate to add Riipen only stuff directly into the platform, especially in the UI of the platform itself.
What we could do instead is add properties to companies but only make it accessible from within Forest. Thoughts?
Emily Masching
Jordan Ell All good by me, I think Tiago Silva will have no objection since a lot of Compliance operates in Forest Admin anyway.
T
Tiago Silva
Emily Masching j/ Jordan Ell, no objections at all! I think it works for the compliance team. Thanks